I live in Russia, and many people around me call themselves opponents of democracy. Their logic is simple - we can live pretty well without democracy. I will prove that there are holes in this logic.
Currently
in the world there are quite prosperous monarchical countries - Jordan,
Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, etc. But these monarchies are very different
from the ancient monarchies - Eastern despotism. This is explained by the fact
that in modern monarchies, which are adjacent to democracies, the authorities
must be good, otherwise they will be overthrown. In civilizations that did not
know what democracy in general was, there was such an oppression of the upper
classes to the lower classes that it is scary for the reader.
When an
authoritarian (for example, a monarchy) state is in the neighborhood of
democracy, the authorities in it are afraid of revolution and therefore cannot
afford to exploit the population too much. They understand that if the
population lives worse than in the neighboring democracy, it will arrange a
revolution and change the government to a democratic one. In other words,
democracies exert an “ennobling” effect on neighboring authoritarian ones.
Despite this impact, these authoritarian countries often pose a military threat
to them.
Ancient
Macedonia was more civilized than ancient Persia, despite the fact that both of
these states were monarchies. This is explained by the fact that Macedonia
bordered on Greece with its democratic traditions.
Another
example from history is Germany in the first half of the 20th century. Germany
was an authoritarian country in the neighborhood of democratic France and
England, and these countries exerted an “ennobling” influence on it; thanks to
the English and French revolutions, in 20th century Germany there was no
serfdom and other vestiges of the Middle Ages. And despite this influence,
Germany posed a military threat to England and France.
One more
example is the confrontation between medieval Muscovy and the Novgorod
Republic. When the Novgorod Republic existed, the peasants both in it and in
the Muscovy were relatively free. But after the conquest of Novgorod by Moscow,
a gradual enslavement of the peasants began, which reached its peak under Peter
the Great.