When the
Nazis came to power in Germany, at first (before the war) there were no mass
concentration camps in the country. The Nazis even tried to deport their Jews
to Palestine, and they succeeded in deporting about 10% of German Jews:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
At the same
time, the Nazis launched harsh anti-Jewish propaganda in the media. Ordinary
Germans were convinced by the authorities that the Jews were to blame for all
the problems of the country - unemployment, the Versailles Peace, and so on. At
first, this propaganda had no effect on ordinary Germans, but later it led to
anti-Jewish pogroms (“Kristallnacht”). So, neither the SS nor the police
participated in these pogroms. Sometimes the police even stood up for the Jews.
And Himmler offered to order the SS to protect the Jews, but Hitler considered
this inappropriate.
Further,
the action of propaganda was intensified many times as a result of the
Anschluss of Austria, which awakened the imperial mentality of the Germans, and
the war. As a result, Jewish emigration was forbidden in 1941, and the
Holocaust happened.
The
Holocaust was not beneficial to the leadership of Germany; it happened because
anti-Jewish propaganda created a monster in the collective unconscious of the
Germans (sorry for my Freudianism), and this monster gained power over the
Nazis themselves.
A similar
story happened in modern Russia. The Russian authorities (Putin) launched a
tough anti-democratic propaganda; the purpose of this propaganda is to instill
in Russians a dislike for the West and for the protest movement. In 2014, this
propaganda intensified due to the annexation of Crimea, which awakened the
imperial mentality of the Russians, and a new “cold war” with the West and
Ukraine. As a result, something happened that is not beneficial to Putin
himself: he had to dismiss in 2020 Dmitry Medvedev, who was president of Russia
in 2008-2012.
Medvedev
has not proven himself to be anything bad, but he has made it clear to the
Russians that he is a democrat, and there was a “mini-thaw” in Russia under his
presidency. Medvedev was a very convenient Putin’s successor whom Putin could
trust. But a side effect of the state propaganda was that Russians developed a
negative attitude towards the democrats in power, and this hit Medvedev. Now in
Russia there is a certain percentage of citizens who blame the democrats in
power for all the troubles of the country, and consider Putin himself a
pro-Western democrat.
Another side effect of the propaganda in Russia has been the growth of pro-Stalinist sentiment among Russians: according to polls by the Levada centre, more than half of Russians are now Stalinists.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий